par Isaac Bickerstaff
Vous avez peut-être entendu des extraits du discours de Donald Trump sur l'état de l'Union.
Entre phrases à la gloire de l'Amérique et annonces de missiles en Europe, difficile de savoir si l'on écoute un prédicateur ou un chef d'entreprise. Et si cette confusion était précisément le but du jeu ?
Deux discours en un seul
Relisons quelques passages :
By Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
March 2, 2026
We all know that free trade is good and tariffs are bad. As the great Murray Rothbard has said "Political boundaries of nations may be important for other reasons, but they have no economic meaning whatever. Suppose, for example, that each state of the United States were a separate nation. Then we would hear a lot of protectionist bellyaching that we are now fortunately spared.
Trump and Netanyahu open the gates of Hell
By Philip Giraldi
The Unz Review
March 2, 2026
So now the die is cast and the United States has joined Israel in an unprovoked attack on a non-threatening Iran to destroy its military capabilities and to bring about regime change. This is a major mis-step that could easily turn out very badly as it is a pointless war of choice that could easily escalate to neighboring states and become nuclear if a reckless Israel decides it needs to "defend" itself against an Iranian response.
He seeks future peace through present strength.
By J.B. Shurk
American Thinker
March 2, 2026
Ever since Iran's "Islamic Revolution" succeeded in erecting a theocratic regime whose leaders condemn America as the "Great Satan," call for "death to America," and kill American soldiers, a question has hung in the air: How many years would the United States tolerate an Islamic dictatorship that murders American citizens, threatens America's economic interests, and annually celebrates having held fifty-two Americans hostage for four hundred and forty-four days by burning American flags ? The answer might be forty-seven.
By Paul Craig Roberts
PaulCraigRoberts.org
March 2, 2026
The failure of Putin and Xi to stand up for their countries in the face of Washington's aggression has convinced Trump that he can act with impunity anywhere in the world. Remember, Trump said words to the effect that he can do whatever he wants. Trumps words reminded me of Lenin when he declared that "the scientific concept of dictatorship means neither more nor less than unlimited power, resting directly on force, not limited by anything, not restricted by any laws, nor any absolute rules.
By Milan Adams
Preppgroup
March 2, 2026
The government recently hired a firm called Gryphon Scientific to analyze how well the stockpile could respond to a range of health disaster scenarios.
The warehouse Greenfieldboyce visited contains 130 shipping containers, but who will be on the receiving end of these shipping containers during an actual emergency?
"While they do have plans for emergencies, and lists of volunteers, they're volunteers," said Paul Petersen, director of emergency preparedness for Tennessee.
Journal dde.crisis de Philippe Grasset
1er mars 2025 (20h00) -... Cette question prétend rappeler, pour suggérer le sens de la guerre contre l'Iran, le titre du livre d'Andrei Amalric 'L'URSS survivra-t-elle en 1984 ?', publié en 1970. Amalric s'était trompé de six ans, mais l'esprit du propos était entièrement valable et s'avéra complètement justifié.
Nous voulons donc laisser entendre, selon une chronologie beaucoup plus hâtive correspondant aux événements (l'attaque contre l'Iran) et aux principaux acteurs (Trump et le reste de la "génération-Epstein" [générationEpstein] où les Israéliens ont largement leur place), que la "guerre" commencée le 28 février pourrait éventuellement conduire à un collapsus de l'architecture institutionnelle des États-Unis, et donc à une chute des USA eux-mêmes.
By Joe LAURIA
The case for each U.S. war in the Middle East over the past 35 years has had progressively weaker rationale and international support. The aggression against Iran launched today has almost none, writes Joe Lauria.
Donald Trump has launched a major war of aggression in the Middle East against Iran and in the preceding weeks made almost no effort, in contrast to previous U.S.
By David BRADY
The Iran intervention could well turn into an open-ended misadventure.
In the wake of the 1991 Gulf War victory, then-President George H.W. Bush rode on a wave of public opinion that would not carry him to reelection. Celebrating the recent victory in Kuwait, he uttered one of the most famous remarks of his administration: "It's a proud day for America.
Ian Proud
If this military action drags out inconclusively, then the mid-terms may prove catastrophic for Trump.
Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei was assassinated in what is being described in western media as a joint airstrike operation. Even though the Israeli air-force carried out airstrikes in and around Tehran, it is clear that these were supported by the U.S. military.
Scott Ritter évoque le "suicide politique" de Donald Trump : "Sans victoire rapide, Trump est fini"
Par Le Média en 4-4-2, le 1er mars 2026
Invité sur la chaîne YouTube du politologue Glenn Diesen, l'ancien analyste de la CIA Scott Ritter a livré une lecture très critique des conséquences d'une opération menée contre l'Iran. Au fil de son intervention, il a repris à son compte une idée souvent martelée par Vladimir Poutine à propos des conflits : pour éviter une rechute, il ne suffirait pas d'"arrêter" une guerre, il faudrait aussi en traiter les causes profondes.
25 février 2026
L'idée qui s'impose à propos de Trump mais pas seulement est celle de mise en scène et mensonge. Un bluff pour masquer jusqu'où peut aller l'irresponsabilité et la volonté de puissance d'un déclin. Cette idée d'un syndic de faillite qui tente de vendre sa propre débandade comme l'ultime droit à détruire sans frein ne le concerne pas seulement, c'est tout le système occidental qui part en fanfare vers l'apocalypse comme ceux qui en France et en Allemagne envisagent d'armer du nucléaire l'Ukraine Il y a la une puérilité effrayante, un système autoesclavagiste qui comme dans l'affaire Epstein produit ses propres adeptes dans la complicité de leur asservissement.
par Andrew P. Napolitano
Le prix du nihilisme de Donald Trump à l'étranger est un gouvernement intérieur qui ne protège pas les droits des personnes et ne respecte aucune loi.
Lorsque le président Donald Trump a annoncé avoir ordonné au Pentagone d'attaquer des bateaux de pêche et des vedettes rapides en haute mer, les accusant de transporter des drogues dangereuses destinées à des acheteurs consentants aux États-Unis, nombre d'entre nous, scrutant les agissements du gouvernement et son mépris de la Constitution, avons perçu cet acte comme un véritable crime et un scandale absolu.
Democrats love foreigners but despise the U.S.A.
By J.B. Shurk
American Thinker
February 28, 2026
If there had been any confusion over what Democrats believe or whom the Democrat Party supports, this week has been clarifying.
Susan Rice - the serial liar who falsely blamed the September 11, 2012, murder of four Americans in Benghazi, Libya, on an Internet video; weaponized Intelligence Community surveillance by illegally unmasking the names of Trump transition officials in 2016; and pushed the Russia Collusion Hoax for the last decade - went on a podcast to promise retribution for any American seen as bending the "knee to Trump." The woman who ran Joe Biden's White House explicitly promised that "this is not going to be an instance of forgive and forget" once Democrats retake power in Washington, D.C.
By Tyler Durden
Zero Hedge
February 28, 2026
Hillary Clinton told members of Congress on Feb. 26 that she does not have knowledge about crimes carried out by the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
"I had no idea about their criminal activities. I do not recall ever encountering Mr. Epstein. I never flew on his plane or visited his island, homes, or offices," the former first lady and secretary of state said in her opening statement to the House Oversight Committee.
By Paul Craig Roberts
PaulCraigRoberts.org
February 28, 2026
On February 25, I wrote on this website that the most important part of President Trump's State of the Union address was the refusal of Democrats to stand if they agreed with his statement: "the first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens."
Actually, there is an equally important element in his address, perhaps more important, and that is President Trump's statement that tariffs would eventually replace the system of income taxation.
The release of the Epstein files has revealed a striking reversal: the same institutions that cast themselves as guardians of integrity now find their own leaders entangled in scandals they once felt safely distant from.
By Anne Hendershott
Crisis Magazine
February 28, 2026
For years, most universities have cast themselves as moral sentinels of American life. They were the first to police speech, enforce ideological conformity, and dismiss ideas that challenge the dominant progressive orthodoxy on campus.
Par Alexandre Lemoine
Les fournisseurs des entreprises aérospatiales et de semi-conducteurs américaines sont confrontés à une pénurie croissante de terres rares. Selon des représentants du secteur, certains d'entre eux ont déjà commencé à refuser certains clients. Cela se produit quelques semaines avant le sommet prévu à Pékin entre Donald Trump et son homologue chinois Xi Jinping.
By Mike FREDENBURG
Fewer sorties and flight hours kick maintenance down the road, hiding performance issues and taking valuable flight time away from pilots
Are the military services babying the F-35 to obscure its true costs while continuing to get enormous sums of taxpayer funding for a plane that has consistently failed to live up to performance expectations?
From the very beginning, the F-35 program has been plagued by hundreds of billions of dollars in cost overruns and repeated schedule delays.
Par Larry Johnson, le 27 février 2026
J'espérais que la rencontre indirecte d'aujourd'hui (jeudi) à Genève entre les États-Unis et l'Iran, avec Oman dans le rôle de messager, apporterait un peu de clarté. Mais nous avons plutôt reçu des messages contradictoires. La troisième série de négociations de jeudi était considérée par de nombreux membres de l'administration Trump comme la diplomatie de la dernière chance avant que le président Trump ne décide de entrer ou non en guerre.